All to often, the elections that receive the most attention in the state of Minnesota are those for legislative positions and also the Governor’s race, while little attention is paid to the judicial elections. Three branches of government are required to maintain the balance and separation of powers and we must start paying equal attention to the activities of each. Who we elect to the judiciary is just as important as who we elect to the House of Representatives, Senate and Governor. We have three outstanding judicial candidates this year that have been working non-stop to increase awareness of the importance of judicial elections and exposing the dangers of Merit Selection and Retention Elections bill.
These three candidates have been doing everything they can to educate the public on the importance of the judicial elections, including holding conference calls open to the public on Sunday evenings. Justice in Minnesota is a nonpartisan, citizen driven effort to restore our judicial branch of government and is sponsoring and moderating these conference calls. I encourage everyone to join in on the next conference call to hear these fantastic candidates, along with other guest speakers The next Judicial Candidate conference call will be held this Sunday, August 22nd at 7:00pm. Join the call by dialing 219-509-811, access code 501618#. Press *6 to mute and unmute.
Chris PenwellLocal candidate Chris Penwell (Republican-endorsed), running for the 10th Judicial District, is another candidate who is determined to uphold the rights of the people. After the 10th district was embroiled in controversy earlier this year, it is good to see a quality and experienced candidate like Mr. Penwell standing out from the crowd of over 20 people vying for the position. Be sure to check out Mr. Penwell’s website for more information. The 10th Judicial District covers 8 counties, including Washington County.
The Show-Me State Shows Up the Federal Government: Prop C Passes Overwhelmingly
On Tuesday, Missouri voters overwhelmingly rejected a federal mandate to purchase health insurance, telling the Obama administration to take a hike and giving Republicans our first political victory in the national campaign to overturn Obamacare!
The following is an article by Tony Messenger of stltoday.com:
ST. LOUIS • Missouri voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected a federal mandate to purchase health insurance, rebuking President Barack Obama’s administration and giving Republicans their first political victory in a national campaign to overturn the controversial health care law passed by Congress in March.
“The citizens of the Show-Me State don’t want Washington involved in their health care decisions,” said Sen. Jane Cunningham, R-Chesterfield, one of the sponsors of the legislation that put Proposition C on the August ballot. She credited a grass-roots campaign involving Tea Party and patriot groups with building support for the anti-Washington proposition.
With most of the vote counted, Proposition C was winning by a ratio of nearly 3 to 1. The measure, which seeks to exempt Missouri from the insurance mandate in the new health care law, includes a provision that would change how insurance companies that go out of business in Missouri liquidate their assets.
“I’ve never seen anything like it,” Cunningham said at a campaign gathering at a private home in Town and Country. “Citizens wanted their voices to be heard.”
About 30 Proposition C supporters whooped it up loudly at 9 p.m. when the returns flashed on the television showing the measure passing with more than 70 percent of the vote.
“It’s the vote heard ’round the world,” said Dwight Janson, 53, from Glendale, clad in an American flag-patterned shirt. Janson said he went to one of the first Tea Party gatherings last year and hopped on the Proposition C bandwagon because he wanted to make a difference.
“I was tired of sitting on the sidelines bouncing my gums,” he said.
Missouri was the first of four states to seek to opt out of the insurance purchase mandate portion of the health care law that had been pushed by Obama. And while many legal scholars question whether the vote will be binding, the overwhelming approval gives the national GOP momentum as Arizona, Florida and Oklahoma hold similar votes during midterm elections in November.
“It’s a big number,” state Sen. Jim Lembke, R-Lemay, said of the vote. “I expected a victory, but not of this magnitude. This is going to propel the issue and several other issues about the proper role of the federal government.”
From almost the moment the Democratic-controlled Congress passed the health care law — which aims to increase the number of Americans with health insurance — Republicans have vowed to try to repeal it. Their primary argument is that they believe the federal government should not be involved in mandating health care decisions at the local level.
While repeal might seem an unlikely strategy, the effort to send a message state by state that voters don’t approve of being told they have to buy insurance could gain momentum.
That’s what Republicans are counting on at least, hoping that the Missouri vote will give the national movement momentum.
“It’s like a domino, and Missouri is the first one to fall,” Cunningham said. “Missouri’s vote will greatly influence the debate in the other states.”
Proposition C faced little organized opposition, although the Missouri Hospital Association mounted a mailer campaign opposing the ballot issue in the last couple of weeks. The hospital association, which spent more than $300,000 in the losing effort, said that without the new federal law, those who don’t have insurance will cause health care providers and other taxpayers to have higher costs.
“The only way to get to the cost problem in health care is to expand the insurance pool,” said hospital association spokesman Dave Dillon. He said the hospital association didn’t plan to sue over the law, but he expected it would be challenged.
“I think there is going to be no shortage of people who want to use the courts to resolve this issue,” he said.
Democrats also generally opposed Proposition C, though they didn’t spend much time or money talking about it.
In the closing days of the campaign, many politicians ‘sidled up” to Proposition C, Cunningham said, seeing the momentum the issue had gained.
Among them was U.S. Rep. Roy Blunt, who won the Republican primary for U.S. Senate on Tuesday night. Late last week, Blunt announced his support of Proposition C.
On Monday, Blunt said he hoped Missouri voters would send a “ballot box message” to the Obama’s administration by overwhelmingly passing the measure.
The question now is whether the administration will respond by suing the state to block passage of the law, much as it did in Arizona recently over illegal immigration.
The issue in both is the same: When state laws conflict with federal laws, the courts have generally ruled in favor of the federal government, because of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Richard Reuben, a law professor at the University of Missouri School of Law, said that if the federal government sues on the issue, it would likely win. Several other Missouri legal and political scholars agreed.
But Cunningham is undaunted. She’s got her own experts, and they’re ready to do battle in court.
“Constitutional experts disagree,” she said. “There is substantial legal status to this thing.”
What Comes After a Trillion? White House Predicts Record Deficit
I hope no one tells President Obama what number comes after a trillion! According to the Associated Press, new estimates from the White House predict the budget deficit will reach a record $1.47 trillion this year. White House budget director Peter Orszag said the numbers represent a “fiscal situation that requires attention”. Ya think?
White House Predicts Record $1.47 Trillion Deficit
WASHINGTON – New estimates from the White House on Friday predict the budget deficit will reach a record $1.47 trillion this year. The government is borrowing 41 cents of every dollar it spends.
That’s actually a little better than the administration predicted in February.
The new estimates paint a grim unemployment picture as the economy experiences a relatively jobless recovery. The unemployment rate, presently averaging 9.5 percent, would average 9 percent next year under the new estimates.
The Office of Management and Budget report has ominous news for President Barack Obama should he seek re-election in 2012 — a still-high unemployment rate of 8.1 percent. That would be well above normal, which is closer to a rate of 5.5 percent to 6 percent. Private economists don’t think the unemployment rate will drop to those levels until well into this decade.
The gaping deficits are of increasing concern to voters. But Obama and Democrats controlling Congress are mostly taking a pass on deficit reduction this year as they await possible recommendations from Obama’s deficit commission.
While there’s a slight improvement in the deficit for the current year, next year’s predicted $1.42 trillion worth of red ink — that’s 37 cents of borrowing for every dollar spent — is looking worse. It’s about $150 billion more than previously predicted, because of still-slumping tax revenues.
White House budget director Peter Orszag said the numbers represent a “fiscal situation that requires attention.”
Deficits have skyrocketed since the recession took hold in 2008 and Congress responded with a massive bailout of the financial system and last year’s $862 billion stimulus measure.
___
Associated Press writer Jeannine Aversa contributed to this report.